Paraphrasing PTAB: Avoid the Temptation to Over-Cite

PTAB

In a recent decision denying a petitioner’s request for rehearing on a decision not to institute an inter partes review proceeding, the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“the Board”) re-emphasized that “procedural defects” can kill a petition. Specifically, the petitioner’s “failure to comply with 35 U.S.C. § 312(a)(3), 37 C.F.R. § 42.22(a)(2), and 37 C.F.R. § 42.104(b)(4)–(5)” was a factor in the Board’s decision.   

The Board gave several procedural reasons for rejecting the petition that included “lengthy, vague, nested citations to broad sections of the record” (example above) and “pervasive use of unclear internal cross references”... “to such an extent that it obfuscates the evidentiary support for the Petition’s assertions.” The Board also cited improper incorporation-by-reference of a declaration.

The decision is IPR2015-00440, Paper 13.

 

Comments

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.