Herring and Patents – And no, I don’t mean fish.
The other day I mentioned a chart from the Economist outlining the largest patent granting countries – with Japan coming out on top.
The Intellectual Asset Management Magazine also picked up on the online chart and added some additional thoughts to the debate concerning software patents. They posit that it is the certainty of the legal protections afforded rather than the existence of protection for information technology that ensures a competitive industry. In other words, patent protection for software is a debate that has little, if anything, to do with maintaining open and competitive IT industries.
Some food for thought…
Is the software patent debate a red herring?
That said, the EIU sees the legal infrastructure in a country as being much less important than other factors, such as IT infrastructure, human capital, R&D environment and support for IT industry development. Of course, it could be that all of these are actually affected by the IP infrastructure of a country (in other words, for example, maybe a company is more likely to invest in R&D or to attract funding for R&D, if the right IP protection is available); but it could also well be that, if the EIU is right, the vitriolic nature of the debate around software patents is actually little more than hot air because, in the end, as long as there is legal certainty – of whatever kind – other factors are far more important in ensuring strong competition in the IT industry. (Emphasis added)
You may be interested in reading the following related posts:
- IP Rights in Software
- ELVIS LIVES — HIS COPYRIGHTS, THAT IS….
- are popup ads illegal (or just annoying?)
- DESIGN PATENTS FOR COMPUTER ICONS
- TUG OF WAR IN EUROPEAN ADOPTION OF STANDARDS FOR THE PATENTING OF SOFTWARE
Posted by Douglas Sorocco, August 5, 2007 at 9:15 pm
Permalink: Herring and Patents – And no, I don’t mean fish.
No Comments
